3GPP Scout / Meetings / RAN4 #121

RAN4 #121Preview

RAN4 #121 preview: what the meeting will debate

16 November to 20 November 2026Calgary3GPP TSG RAN WG4Last updated 2026-11-10

At a glance

  1. The meeting examines 6G UE grouping for RRM, channel models, output power and radiated performance.

  2. UE grouping proposals differ on whether maintaining a group needs separate criteria.

  3. Output power proposals disagree on whether to specify ΔTRxSRS, remove it, or define a separate requirement.

  4. Channel model work also addresses 400 MHz test equipment constraints and cross-polarization modelling.

Your topic

Follow a topic from RAN4 #121 and get its next outcome by email.

Scout emails you when a new agreement or decision on it is recorded, with the source for each. Or ask Scout and get an answer that cites the exact TDoc. Free to start.

Another topic or company? Follow it

Hottest topics

8.6.3

6G UE group for RRM

Significance 55 of 100, 19 TDocs

MediaTek proposes standardized, verifiable criteria for maintaining a 6G UE group. China Mobile opposes separate maintenance criteria and proposes using establishment criteria and group updates instead.

Sources: R4-2630038, MediaTek; R4-2630791, China Mobile. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © MediaTek, China Mobile.

More detail

The proposed maintenance checks reuse RSRP and RSRQ differences between UEs, with separate thresholds for hysteresis and time-to-trigger. The disagreement concerns how group membership is maintained after establishment, not whether grouping is studied.

8.7.2

Channel model

Significance 49 of 100, 14 TDocs

Qualcomm proposes identifying test equipment and fader bandwidth constraints for practical rCDL implementation at 400 MHz. Nokia proposes against using XP models without further cross-polarization modelling updates.

Sources: R4-2630063, Qualcomm; R4-2630140, Nokia. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Qualcomm, Nokia.

2 proposals on this topic

The bandwidth question concerns whether the channel model can be implemented in the intended test setup. The XP proposal concerns the model itself, so the two submissions address different parts of test design.

Qualcomm

Proposal
RAN4 to identify in this Study Item potential test equipment/fader bandwidth constraints relevant to the practical rCDL implementation at 400 MHz.

Source: R4-2630063, Qualcomm. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Qualcomm.

Nokia

Proposal
Do not use XP models without further updates to cross-pol modelling.

Source: R4-2630140, Nokia. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Nokia.

8.3.1

Output power requirements

Significance 47 of 100, 24 TDocs

Output power submissions offer different treatments of ΔTRxSRS. LG Electronics proposes using tolerable SRS power imbalance to guide a requirement, while Huawei (with HiSilicon) opposes defining one.

Sources: R4-2631075, LG Electronics; R4-2630606, Huawei; R4-2631138, OPPO; R4-2631322, ZTE. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © LG Electronics, Huawei, OPPO, ZTE.

More detail

OPPO proposes removing ΔTRxSRS from the equation without specifying a requirement. ZTE (with Sanechips) also prefers removal from the equation, but proposes a separate requirement.

4.2.1.25.8.27.11.37.6.4.17.6.5.17.6.6.17.6.6.1.17.6.6.2.17.6.7.1.17.6.7.2.17.7.47.8.3

UE RF requirements

Significance 46 of 100, 49 TDocs

UE RF work includes proposed values and device classifications for specific satellite-related cases. Sharp proposes a 2 dB ΔRIBC value for VSAT types 2 and 5.

Sources: R4-2630336, Sharp; R4-2630398, LG Electronics. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Sharp, LG Electronics.

2 proposals on this topic

LG Electronics proposes VSAT type 8 for a small, electronically steered Ka-band device using HD-FDD with LEO. These proposals address different requirements, so neither resolves the other.

Sharp

Proposal
Proposal 1: Adopt ΔRIBC=2dB for VSAT type 2 and 5

Source: R4-2630336, Sharp. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Sharp.

LG Electronics

Proposal
Proposal 1: It’s proposed to use the VSAT type 8 for this kind of device in similar manner as was done for Ku-band (Mobile VSAT ...

Source: R4-2630398, LG Electronics. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © LG Electronics.

8.11.1

Radiated performance metric

Significance 46 of 100, 11 TDocs

Radiated performance work examines how TAS state affects measurement. Samsung proposes recording the advantages and disadvantages of TAS OFF and TAS ON measurement in the 6G TR.

Sources: R4-2630270, Samsung; R4-2630588, Apple. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Samsung, Apple.

2 proposals on this topic

Apple proposes studying TAS-ON dwell time so antenna selection can settle before capture. Its proposal would have manufacturers declare dwell time within a range that remains FFS.

Samsung

Proposal
Capture the following pros and cons analysis into 6G TR for TAS OFF and TAS ON measurement:

Source: R4-2630270, Samsung. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Samsung.

Apple

Proposal
RAN4 to study the dwell time needed for TAS-ON, to allow the UE antenna selection to settle before the measurement is captured. ...

Source: R4-2630588, Apple. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Apple.

Contested proposals

Proposals already uploaded where companies take opposing positions on the same point. These are proposals, not decisions.

Grouping maintenance criteria

MediaTek

Proposes
The grouping maintenance criteria should also be standardized and 3GPP-verifiable, reusing the quantities of the grouping establishing criteria (RSRP/RSRQ difference between UEs and its variation) ...

Source: R4-2630038, MediaTek. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © MediaTek.

China Mobile

Opposes
it is not proposed to have grouping maintenance criteria, which can be covered by grouping establishing criteria and UE group update/change.

Source: R4-2630791, China Mobile. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © China Mobile.

ΔTRxSRS requirements

LG Electronics

Proposes
Understanding the tolerable level of total SRS power imbalance from a network-performance perspective may provide useful guidance for defining ΔTRxSRS requirements, considering the expected Tx-Rx ...

Source: R4-2631075, LG Electronics. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © LG Electronics.

Huawei (with HiSilicon)

Opposes
Do not define the ∆TRxSRS requirements, since the benefit of SRS power imbalance compensation is confirmed as “limited”.

Source: R4-2630606, Huawei. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Huawei.

∆TRxSRS

OPPO

Proposes
Proposal 9: In 6G, remove ∆TRxSRS from equation and no requirement will be specified.

Source: R4-2631138, OPPO. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © OPPO.

ZTE (with Sanechips)

Prefers another option
It is preferred to remove ΔTRxSRS from the equation and specify the requirement separately.

Source: R4-2631322, ZTE. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © ZTE.

What to watch

  • Watch whether separate UE group maintenance thresholds remain in the RRM discussion.

    Sources: R4-2630038, MediaTek; R4-2630791, China Mobile. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © MediaTek, China Mobile.

  • Watch whether ΔTRxSRS stays in the equation and whether any separate requirement is proposed.

    Sources: R4-2631075, LG Electronics; R4-2630606, Huawei; R4-2631138, OPPO; R4-2631322, ZTE. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © LG Electronics, Huawei, OPPO, ZTE.

  • Watch for identified fader bandwidth constraints on 400 MHz rCDL tests.

    Source: R4-2630063, Qualcomm. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Qualcomm.

  • Watch whether cross-polarization updates become a condition for using XP models.

    Source: R4-2630140, Nokia. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Nokia.

  • Watch how a TAS-ON dwell-time range is handled alongside the proposed measurement comparison.

    Sources: R4-2630270, Samsung; R4-2630588, Apple. 3GPP TSG RAN WG4 #121. © Samsung, Apple.

Busiest agenda items

Agenda itemTitleTDocs
8.2.2.1CBW24
8.3.1Output power requirements24
8.4.3.1TN coexistence study for ~7 GHz24
7.15.3RRM measurement prediction (UE sided model)21
7.20.3RRM Core requirement20
8.1.1Feature lead topic summary20
8.3.2Tx Requirements20
8.5.2Band and band combination definition20
7.20.5.1Type 1-C BS where differences are needed from Rel-1919
8.5.3Band combination requirement19
8.6.36G UE group for RRM19
8.7.4Receiver assumptions, Interference profile/modelling, TxEVM assumptions and Others19

Built by 3GPP Scout from the public meeting record (2177 TDocs registered, catalog synced 2026-11-09). Significance scores rank topics by decisions, contention, breadth and volume. Excerpts are at most 25 words and link to the original on the 3GPP file server.