3GPP Scout / Updates / Company proposal change

Company proposal changeRAN2 #135-bis

Xiaomi asks when Topology 2 needs a session release indication

Published 2026-11-11Updated 2026-11-113GPP TSG RAN WG2 #135-bis

At a glance

Xiaomi asked RAN2, the radio layer 2 and radio resource control (RRC) working group, whether resource release implies session release.

What changed in the proposal

Both Xiaomi contributions address Ambient Internet of Things (A-IoT) Topology 2 and the reader's session release. At RAN2 #135, Xiaomi wrote "No need to introduce a separate session release indication". Xiaomi said deconfiguring or releasing A-IoT resources implies termination of A-IoT operation by the user equipment (UE) reader. It said the reader can then terminate an ongoing session through UE implementation, without a specification change.

Source: R2-2604854, Xiaomi, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #135. © Xiaomi.

At RAN2 #135-bis, Xiaomi's contribution asks whether resource release implies session release. If it does not, the later contribution says "explicit session release indication is supported". Our reading: This condition modifies the earlier objection, rather than recording a working group agreement. Neither contribution records a RAN2 decision about whether releasing resources ends a session.

Source: R2-2607424, Xiaomi, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #135-bis. © Xiaomi.

Xiaomi's later contribution also asks about a new signaling radio bearer (SRB) carrying inventory requests. Our reading: Inventory requests ask A-IoT devices to identify themselves. The contribution asks whether session release and downlink non-access stratum (NAS) data transfer should use the same or different messages. Our reading: That message question is conditional on a new bearer carrying inventory requests, not a decision to use one.

Sources

  1. R2-2607424, Xiaomi, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #135-bis. © Xiaomi.
  2. R2-2604854, Xiaomi, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #135. © Xiaomi.

How this page was made

Written with AI assistance from TDocs indexed by 3GPP Scout. An AI model (GPT-6 Sol) drafted each sentence and named the source it rests on. Code checked every quote word for word against the stored source text, and the live check fetched each TDoc again before publishing. A second AI model from another company (Claude Opus 5.5) reviewed the page against the same sources. The 3GPP documents themselves govern.