3GPP Scout / Updates / Company proposal change

Company proposal changeRAN3 #133-bis

China Mobile proposes conditional RLF report transfer at RAN3 #133-bis

Published 2026-11-06Updated 2026-11-063GPP TSG RAN WG3 #133-bis

At a glance

China Mobile proposed sending a radio link failure (RLF) report from the last serving node to the initiating node.

What changed in the proposal

China Mobile's later contribution was available at RAN3 #133-bis, a radio access network working group 3 meeting. Both papers concern mobility robustness optimization (MRO) for layer one and layer two triggered mobility (LTM) between central units. Their titles identify this scope as inter-CU LTM.

At RAN3 #133, China Mobile proposed: "For subsequent LTM, transfer the RLF report to the initiating gNB". That proposal names the initiating gNB, a base station, as the report's recipient. China Mobile proposed the transfer to enable optimization of LTM configuration. The RAN3 #133 register marked that contribution not treated.

Source: R3-263462, China Mobile, 3GPP TSG RAN WG3 #133. © China Mobile.

At RAN3 #133-bis, the later Proposal 1 named the last serving node as sender. The proposed condition involves the re-connecting cell of user equipment (UE). China Mobile proposed transfer in this case: "if the node which includes the UE re-connecting cell has Xn interface with initiating node". Xn is the interface linking that cell's node and the initiating node in this case. Our reading: The later Proposal 1 specifies a sender and Xn condition absent from the earlier Proposal 1. The RAN3 #133-bis register records no decision on that contribution.

Source: R3-264213, China Mobile, 3GPP TSG RAN WG3 #133-bis. © China Mobile.

Sources

  1. R3-264213, China Mobile, 3GPP TSG RAN WG3 #133-bis. © China Mobile.
  2. R3-263462, China Mobile, 3GPP TSG RAN WG3 #133. © China Mobile.

How this page was made

Written with AI assistance from TDocs indexed by 3GPP Scout. An AI model (GPT-6 Sol) drafted each sentence and named the source it rests on. Code checked every quote word for word against the stored source text, and the live check fetched each TDoc again before publishing. A second AI model from another company (Claude Opus 5.5) reviewed the page against the same sources. The 3GPP documents themselves govern.