| Open question | Company | What they push | TDoc |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where should the 6G core handle requests with intent? | China Mobile (with 12 co-submitters) | China Mobile and co-submitters describe one or two ISF instances with two logical roles. | S2-2611402 approved |
| Nokia (with 8 co-submitters) | Nokia and eight co-submitters, including InterDigital, propose an optional AI domain separate from the PS domain in a not-treated conclusion pCR. | S2-2610362 not treated | |
| InterDigital (with Ofinno) | InterDigital and Ofinno's postponed SV#18.2 update lists PCF-embedded AI agent planning as one subvariant. | S2-2611322 postponed | |
| Should UE intent use the control plane or user plane? | Nokia (with 8 co-submitters) | Nokia and eight co-submitters propose UP transport to the AI domain in a not-treated conclusion pCR. | S2-2610362 not treated |
| China Mobile | China Mobile proposes a dedicated or existing NAS message to carry UE intent to a network agent function. | S2-2609683 not treated | |
| How should operators control AI use in the 6G core? | Samsung (with SK Telecom) | Samsung and SK Telecom's approved interim text places operator control in 6G CN enforcement and OAM-based control, with OAM details FFS in SA5. | S2-2611398 approved |
| China Mobile | China Mobile proposes an operator control functionality governing AI use under operator requirements. | S2-2610037 not treated | |
| Ericsson | Ericsson proposes that a request needing AI is processed without it when AI is disabled or constraints are unmet. | S2-2609462 not treated | |
| Should 6G network functions exchange trained ML models? | Ericsson (with AT&T, T-Mobile USA, Deutsche Telekom) | Ericsson, AT&T, T-Mobile USA and Deutsche Telekom propose that the 6G CN not standardize ML model exchange between NFs. | S2-2609425 not treated |
| Qualcomm | Qualcomm proposes trained-model provisioning from a dedicated training NF to AI-capable NFs. | S2-2609772 not treated | |
| China Telecom (with 11 co-submitters) | China Telecom's postponed pCR, co-signed by Ericsson, Qualcomm and nine others, proposes an Editor's Note leaving open how model provisioning and multi-vendor interoperability would be supported. | S2-2611367 postponed |
Full brief with every quote, source and caveat: HTML · PDF
Coverage: SA2 #177 (Prague, 2026-10-12 to 2026-10-16), topic agenda items only. Scout read 5 recorded decisions and 117 company positions or passages; the full brief cites 13 TDocs and shows each verbatim quote, matched against the TDoc text. Summaries are Scout's reading. Register status not treated means the meeting recorded no decision on the document, not that it was rejected. Not covered: plenary decisions after the meeting, email discussions.
TDoc links go to the 3GPP file server.
More briefs: all 3GPP Scout meeting briefs · 3gppscout.com